Also, I decided that they shouldn't have given me as much freedom as they did with the term something.
This one is supposed to be a book review, of all things to write in a History class, of a book that I read the first chapter of. I must say that I was incredibly intrigued and excited by the book, until I started reading it. An abundance of numbers, figures, factoids, and badly written vignettes populated each page and stared up at me with wanton eyes. So, like the smart college student I am, I closed the book after the first chapter and decided that was good. It was now time to set out on the adventure of writing four pages of drivel on something I hadn't even read. So I decided to get creative in order to at least give the TAs a good time while reading the paper, and who knows? Maybe someday they'll use my paper as one of the bad examples. I would be so proud.
So, here's the outline. Enticing, no? It's even more fun to write the actual paper. Updates coming soon on that. I'll keep y'all posted.
I.
INTRODUCTION-1 page
a.
Needlessly long introduction that discusses some
sort of existential crap
b.
A three-sentence-too-long tie in of said
existential crap to actual topic of intro paragraph
c.
Discussion of intro paragraph material,
embellished with factoids that are not present in the book in question
d.
Awkward transition into the thesis
e.
THESIS
f.
Runoff sentence—stemming from the thesis
i. Potential
joke (?)
II.
BODY-2 ½ pages
a.
Topic 1
i. Introduction
to topic 1
ii. Actual
discussion of topic 1
iii. Fanciful,
decorative language that extols the reader of the essay to question virtually
everything they knew about this book
iv. Unanswered
questions regarding the human condition
v. Attempt
to answer one of the questions
1.
Possible tie-in of actual information from the
book? Might yield extra points
vi. Semi-resolution
of topic 1
b.
Topic 2
i. Introduction
to topic 2
ii. Clever
metaphor involving imagery and hypothetical situations that have little if
anything to do with topic 2
iii. Somewhat
untraceable tie-in to topic 2
iv. More
unanswered questions
v. Melancholy
exclamation of the futility of any attempt to answer questions regarding topic
2
vi. Utterly
hopeless attempt to answer questions regarding topic 2 anyway
vii. Unexpectedly
smooth transition into
c.
Topic 3
i. Introduction
to topic 3
ii. Direct
quote from the book to give the appearance that said book has actually been
read
iii. In-depth
and completely wrong analysis of direct literary quote from book
iv. Tie-in
to topic 1 to give the impression that this essay is unified
v. Bathroom
break
vi. Restatement
of topic 3 to give a feeling of finality and completeness to this most amazing
of paragraphs
III.
CONCLUSION- ½ page
a.
THESIS but with two or three words changed or
switched around
b.
Reassuring statement to the reader affirming the
effectiveness of this essay
c.
More existential questions, involving me, as the
writer, as the primary character who is wondering where life will go from this
point forward and how things got to be this way
d.
Brief reflection on how writing this paper has
changed my life
e.
Naïve yet inspiring statement that I, as the
author, hope this paper has changed the lives of those who read and/or edit the
paper
f.
And then the music gets hopeful
g.
IT’S OVER!!!
Bet you get full points for awesomeness anyway.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of the most truthful pieces of literature I have ever read... Just saying.
ReplyDelete